StockData

Danaos vs Star Bulk Carriers

DAC and SBLK side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How DAC and SBLK compare

Danaos grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.8% versus −17.6% for Star Bulk Carriers).

Danaos keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 47.4% compared with 8.1% at Star Bulk Carriers.

Danaos scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 2 for Star Bulk Carriers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricDACSBLK
Size and price
Share price$150.85$28.01
Change, 1 year59.4%50.1%
Change, 5 years108%48.4%
Beta (5Y)0.680.69
Employees1,718294
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)2
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score4 (better)1
Health score4 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)2.8% (better)−17.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average17.7% (better)8.5%
Net income growth (TTM)−2.1% (better)−72.4%
EPS growth (TTM)2.7% (better)−73.9%
EPS growth, 5Y average32.9%48.8% (better)
Profitability
Operating margin47.8% (better)13.1%
Net margin47.4% (better)8.1%
FCF margin–20.3%
Return on equity12.9% (better)3.4%
Return on invested capital12.9% (better)6.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.30–
Net debt / EBITDA−0.03–
Interest coverage–1.9×
Current ratio9.30 (better)1.91
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio12.8%40.8%
Years of dividend growth2 (better)0
Dividend growth, 5Y average–43.1%
Ownership
Held by institutions21.0%35.7%
Held by insiders53.6%18.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$2.6B
Short interest, % of float19.0%4.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.