Caesars Entertainment vs PENN Entertainment
CZR and PENN side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CZR and PENN compare
Caesars Entertainment is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as PENN Entertainment ($5.9B against $2.1B).
PENN Entertainment grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.1% versus 2.4% for Caesars Entertainment).
Caesars Entertainment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −4.0% compared with −12.7% at PENN Entertainment.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CZR | PENN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.9B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $29.09 | $15.89 |
| Change, 1 year | 55.4% | −4.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −72.7% | −74.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.84 | 1.48 |
| Employees | 50K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 5 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.5× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 1.8× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 9.7× | – |
| FCF yield | 10.3% | – |
| Fair value | $60.59 | $35.52 |
| Margin of safety | 52.0% | 55.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.4% | 6.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 25.9% (better) | 14.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 15.9% (better) | −7.9% |
| Net margin | −4.0% (better) | −12.7% |
| FCF margin | 5.2% | – |
| Return on equity | −12.8% (better) | −37.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.1% (better) | −10.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.47 | 1.49 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.30 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.8× (better) | −1.3× |
| Current ratio | 0.85 | 0.89 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.67 (better) | 0.32 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 11.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 11.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 97.3% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 5.0% | 7.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.4M | $888K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.7% | 13.6% |
Go deeper
- CZR stock overview
- CZR income statement
- CZR valuation and score
- PENN stock overview
- PENN income statement
- PENN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.