StockData

Cryoport vs Kamada

CYRX and KMDA side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CYRX and KMDA compare

Kamada grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.2% versus 11.8% for Cryoport).

Cryoport scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Kamada), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCYRXKMDA
Size and price
Market cap$1.0B–
Share price$19.89$8.09
Change, 1 year125%11.1%
Change, 5 years−72.5%44.5%
Beta (5Y)1.920.76
Employees738393
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)5
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score4 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S5.2×–
P/B2.1×–
FCF yield−1.9%–
Fair value$15.89–
Margin of safety−25.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)11.8%13.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average17.5% (better)6.3%
Net income growth (TTM)−158%–
EPS growth (TTM)−178%–
EPS growth, 5Y average–−1.6%
Profitability
Gross margin46.9% (better)40.8%
Operating margin−20.0%14.5% (better)
Net margin−21.5%–
FCF margin−9.8%–
Return on equity−8.3%–
Return on invested capital−32.9%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA–−0.54
Interest coverage−18.3×26.8× (better)
Current ratio2.044.06 (better)
Altman Z-score1.38–
Piotroski F-score5–
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions93.9%8.6%
Held by insiders3.6%45.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$6.3M−$1.7M (better)
Short interest, % of float7.1%0.53%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.