Casella Waste Systems vs GFL Environmental
CWST and GFL side by side, both in electric, gas, and sanitary services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CWST and GFL compare
Casella Waste Systems grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.6% versus 7.8% for GFL Environmental).
GFL Environmental keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 58.0% compared with 0.29% at Casella Waste Systems.
Casella Waste Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for GFL Environmental), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CWST | GFL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.9B | – |
| Share price | $93.33 | $45.21 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.9% | 3.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.5% | 14.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.42 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 5,600 | 15K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 1037× | – |
| P/S | 3.0× | – |
| P/B | 3.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 56.2× | – |
| FCF yield | 1.8% | – |
| Fair value | $95.62 | – |
| Margin of safety | 2.4% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.6% (better) | 7.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.9% (better) | 9.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −48.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −50.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −42.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.4% (better) | 20.7% |
| Operating margin | 3.4% | – |
| Net margin | 0.29% | 58.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 0.36% | 53.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.6% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.85 (better) | 1.02 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.39 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.99 (better) | 0.58 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.36 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 0.81% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 121% | 74.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.7% | 20.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.6M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.1% | – |
Go deeper
- CWST stock overview
- CWST income statement
- CWST valuation and score
- GFL stock overview
- GFL income statement
- GFL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.