Cushman & Wakefield vs Jones Lang LaSalle
CWK and JLL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CWK and JLL compare
Jones Lang LaSalle is the larger company, worth 5.3 times as much as Cushman & Wakefield ($16.6B against $3.1B).
On earnings, Jones Lang LaSalle is cheaper: it trades at 17.2× trailing earnings, against 44.3× for Cushman & Wakefield.
Jones Lang LaSalle grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.2% versus 11.0% for Cushman & Wakefield).
Jones Lang LaSalle scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Cushman & Wakefield), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CWK | JLL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.1B | $16.6B |
| Share price | $13.30 | $359.79 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.5% | 18.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −33.4% | 34.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.54 | 1.30 |
| Employees | 53K | 113K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 44.3× | 17.2× (better) |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.1× (better) | 11.4× |
| P/FCF | 12.5× | – |
| PEG | – | 2.36 |
| FCF yield | 8.0% | – |
| Fair value | $9.34 | $334.47 |
| Margin of safety | −42.5% | −7.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.0% | 11.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 9.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −66.4% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −65.9% | 79.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 16.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 4.4% | 4.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.64% | – |
| FCF margin | 2.3% | – |
| Return on equity | 3.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 8.9% | 13.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.31 | 0.12 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.70 | 0.30 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.08 | 1.13 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.85 | 3.48 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 3.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.2% | 93.9% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 1.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$989K (better) | −$16.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 2.5% |
Go deeper
- CWK stock overview
- CWK income statement
- CWK valuation and score
- JLL stock overview
- JLL income statement
- JLL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.