Camping World vs Openlane
CWH and OPLN side by side, both in retail-auto dealers & gasoline stations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CWH and OPLN compare
Openlane is the larger company, worth 9.5 times as much as Camping World ($4.3B against $448M).
Openlane grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.8% versus −5.5% for Camping World).
Openlane keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.2% compared with −4.2% at Camping World.
Camping World pays a dividend yielding 2.9%; Openlane does not pay one.
Openlane scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 5 for Camping World), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CWH | OPLN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $448M | $4.3B |
| Share price | $4.34 | $34.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −61.5% | 38.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −89.8% | 135% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.60 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 362 | 4,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 2.0× |
| P/B | 8.8× | 2.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 13.2× |
| P/FCF | – | 11.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.9% |
| Fair value | $11.90 | $22.88 |
| Margin of safety | 63.5% (better) | −51.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.5% | 12.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.2% | 7.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 15.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.4% | 45.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | −3.5% | 11.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −4.2% | 9.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 17.8% |
| Return on equity | −146% | 13.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −12.0% | 14.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 28.02 | 0.34 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.84 |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.24 (better) | 1.16 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.34 | 1.58 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.9% (better) | 2.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.2% | 87.7% |
| Held by insiders | 42.6% | 7.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$289M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.3% | 1.5% |
Go deeper
- CWH stock overview
- CWH income statement
- CWH valuation and score
- OPLN stock overview
- OPLN income statement
- OPLN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.