Camping World vs Group 1 Automotive
CWH and GPI side by side, both in retail-auto dealers & gasoline stations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CWH and GPI compare
Group 1 Automotive is the larger company, worth 6.9 times as much as Camping World ($3.1B against $448M).
Group 1 Automotive grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.4% versus −5.5% for Camping World).
Group 1 Automotive keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.7% compared with −4.2% at Camping World.
Both pay dividends: Camping World yields 2.9% and Group 1 Automotive 0.83%.
Group 1 Automotive scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Camping World), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CWH | GPI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $448M | $3.1B |
| Share price | $4.34 | $260.21 |
| Change, 1 year | −61.5% | −33.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −89.8% | 36.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.60 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 362 | 20K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 8.2× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.1× |
| P/B | 8.8× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 7.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 13.7× |
| FCF yield | – | 7.3% |
| Fair value | $11.90 | $298.22 |
| Margin of safety | 63.5% (better) | 12.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.5% | −3.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.2% | 16.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 0.96% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 10.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.4% (better) | 15.9% |
| Operating margin | −3.5% | 3.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −4.2% | 1.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 1.0% |
| Return on equity | −146% | 12.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −12.0% | 9.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 28.02 | 1.27 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.82 |
| Current ratio | 1.24 | 1.32 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.34 | 3.24 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.9% (better) | 0.83% |
| Payout ratio | – | 6.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 27.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 12.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.9% | 13.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.2% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 42.6% | 19.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $211M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.3% | 14.9% |
Go deeper
- CWH stock overview
- CWH income statement
- CWH valuation and score
- GPI stock overview
- GPI income statement
- GPI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.