CaliberCos vs Seritage Growth Properties
CWD and SRG side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CWD and SRG compare
Seritage Growth Properties is the larger company, worth 21 times as much as CaliberCos ($92.4M against $4.4M).
Seritage Growth Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−23.7% versus −49.7% for CaliberCos).
Seritage Growth Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 1 for CaliberCos), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CWD | SRG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.4M | $92.4M |
| Share price | $0.426 | $1.64 |
| Change, 1 year | −85.6% | −59.7% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −90.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.49 | 1.37 |
| Employees | – | 5 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 7.2× |
| P/B | – | 0.3× |
| Fair value | – | $2.62 |
| Margin of safety | – | 37.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −49.7% | −23.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −31.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | −117% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | −0.56 (better) | −3.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.9% | 39.5% |
| Held by insiders | 11.7% | 24.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.9% | 10.8% |
Go deeper
- CWD stock overview
- CWD income statement
- CWD valuation and score
- SRG stock overview
- SRG income statement
- SRG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.