CVD Equipment vs Velo3D
CVV and VELO side by side, both in special industry machinery, except metalworking. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CVV and VELO compare
Velo3D is the larger company, worth 4.2 times as much as CVD Equipment ($133M against $31.6M).
Velo3D grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.9% versus −31.0% for CVD Equipment).
CVD Equipment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 51.7% compared with −86.2% at Velo3D.
CVD Equipment scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Velo3D), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CVV | VELO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $31.6M | $133M |
| Share price | $4.54 | $4.15 |
| Change, 1 year | 43.2% | −28.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.8% | −99.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.00 | −0.05 |
| Employees | 85 | 28 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 3.8× | – |
| P/S | 2.0× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 1.0× |
| FCF yield | −2.7% (better) | −50.1% |
| Fair value | – | $9.04 |
| Margin of safety | – | 54.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −31.0% | 30.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.8% | 19.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.2% (better) | 11.5% |
| Operating margin | −37.9% (better) | −86.2% |
| Net margin | 51.7% (better) | −86.2% |
| FCF margin | −5.4% (better) | −104% |
| Return on equity | 27.0% (better) | −66.4% |
| Return on invested capital | −32.8% (better) | −110% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | −1195.0× | −34.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 13.24 (better) | 5.12 |
| Altman Z-score | 10.06 (better) | −2.17 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 17.8% | 37.9% |
| Held by insiders | 41.2% | 47.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $0 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.2% | 35.0% |
Go deeper
- CVV stock overview
- CVV income statement
- CVV valuation and score
- VELO stock overview
- VELO income statement
- VELO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.