CPI Aerostructures vs TAT Technologies
CVU and TATT side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CVU and TATT compare
TAT Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.1% versus 2.6% for CPI Aerostructures).
TAT Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.3% compared with 5.1% at CPI Aerostructures.
TAT Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for CPI Aerostructures), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CVU | TATT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $60.7M | – |
| Share price | $4.58 | $37.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 118% | −6.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 55.8% | 472% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 0.74 |
| Employees | 192 | 3,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.4× | – |
| P/S | 0.8× | – |
| P/B | 2.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.5× | – |
| FCF yield | −3.9% | – |
| Fair value | $5.11 | – |
| Margin of safety | 10.4% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 12.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −4.6% | 18.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 53.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 31.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.5% | 25.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.2% | 10.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.1% | 11.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.2% | 3.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.4% (better) | 11.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.2% (better) | 11.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.06 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −1.80 |
| Interest coverage | 4.3× | 27.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.97 | 4.83 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.42 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 20.5% | 58.4% |
| Held by insiders | 10.5% | 39.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$478K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.55% | 14.8% |
Go deeper
- CVU stock overview
- CVU income statement
- CVU valuation and score
- TATT stock overview
- TATT income statement
- TATT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.