CPI Aerostructures vs Park Aerospace
CVU and PKE side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CVU and PKE compare
Park Aerospace is the larger company, worth 8.8 times as much as CPI Aerostructures ($536M against $60.7M).
On earnings, CPI Aerostructures is cheaper: it trades at 16.4× trailing earnings, against 33.8× for Park Aerospace.
Park Aerospace grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.7% versus 2.6% for CPI Aerostructures).
Park Aerospace keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 18.4% compared with 5.1% at CPI Aerostructures.
Park Aerospace pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; CPI Aerostructures does not pay one.
Park Aerospace scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 7 for CPI Aerostructures), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CVU | PKE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $60.7M | $536M |
| Share price | $4.58 | $24.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 118% | 24.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 55.8% | 72.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 0.72 |
| Employees | 192 | 125 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.4× (better) | 33.8× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 6.6× |
| P/B | 2.2× (better) | 3.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.5× (better) | 22.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 46.8× |
| PEG | – | 13.51 |
| FCF yield | −3.9% | 2.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $5.11 | $21.07 |
| Margin of safety | 10.4% (better) | −15.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 27.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −4.6% | 9.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 103% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 100% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 18.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.5% | 32.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.2% | 21.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.1% | 18.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.2% | 14.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.4% (better) | 11.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.2% | 29.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 4.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.97 | 22.75 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.42 | 27.37 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 69.4% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 20.5% | 88.6% |
| Held by insiders | 10.5% | 4.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$9.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.55% | 6.4% |
Go deeper
- CVU stock overview
- CVU income statement
- CVU valuation and score
- PKE stock overview
- PKE income statement
- PKE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.