CPI Aerostructures vs Karman
CVU and KRMN side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CVU and KRMN compare
Karman is the larger company, worth 89 times as much as CPI Aerostructures ($5.4B against $60.7M).
On earnings, CPI Aerostructures is cheaper: it trades at 16.4× trailing earnings, against 104× for Karman.
Karman grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (56.3% versus 2.6% for CPI Aerostructures).
Karman keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.5% compared with 5.1% at CPI Aerostructures.
Karman scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for CPI Aerostructures), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CVU | KRMN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $60.7M | $5.4B |
| Share price | $4.58 | $40.66 |
| Change, 1 year | 118% | −40.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 55.8% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.60 | 1.48 |
| Employees | 192 | 1,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.4× (better) | 104× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 8.1× |
| P/B | 2.2× (better) | 12.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.5× (better) | 36.3× |
| FCF yield | −3.9% | −0.14% (better) |
| Fair value | $5.11 | $13.21 |
| Margin of safety | 10.4% (better) | −208% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.6% | 56.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −4.6% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 345% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 388% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.5% | 42.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 8.2% | 16.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.1% | 7.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.2% | −1.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.4% (better) | 12.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.2% (better) | 10.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.94 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.65 |
| Interest coverage | 4.3× (better) | 1.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.97 | 3.10 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.42 | 3.59 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 20.5% | 93.8% |
| Held by insiders | 10.5% | 62.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$9.2M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.55% | 38.6% |
Go deeper
- CVU stock overview
- CVU income statement
- CVU valuation and score
- KRMN stock overview
- KRMN income statement
- KRMN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.