StockData

CVRx vs Pulmonx

CVRX and LUNG side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CVRX and LUNG compare

Pulmonx is the larger company, worth 7.6 times as much as CVRx ($123M against $16.2M).

CVRx grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.8% versus −3.2% for Pulmonx).

Pulmonx keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −47.9% compared with −88.3% at CVRx.

Pulmonx scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for CVRx), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCVRXLUNG
Size and price
Market cap$16.2M$123M
Share price$0.607$2.86
Change, 1 year−93.6%45.9%
Change, 5 years−95.4%−91.7%
Beta (5Y)1.141.73
Employees223296
StockData Score
Total score56 (better)
Valuation score12 (better)
Growth score22
Performance score11
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.3× (better)1.4×
P/B1.2× (better)3.6×
FCF yield−260%−20.8% (better)
Fair value–$4.74
Margin of safety–39.7%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)7.8% (better)−3.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average56.4% (better)22.6%
Profitability
Gross margin86.9% (better)77.4%
Operating margin−81.9%−44.4% (better)
Net margin−88.3%−47.9% (better)
FCF margin−69.7%−28.8% (better)
Return on equity−172%−90.3% (better)
Return on invested capital−299%−156% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity4.241.11 (better)
Interest coverage−8.0× (better)−9.4×
Current ratio6.80 (better)4.05
Altman Z-score−10.15−5.75 (better)
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−35.1%–
Shareholder yield−35.1%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions57.4%61.0%
Held by insiders49.9%16.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months$247K (better)−$548K
Short interest, % of float13.6%2.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.