StockData

CapsoVision vs Nano-X Imaging

CV and NNOX side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CV and NNOX compare

Nano-X Imaging grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.4% versus 6.4% for CapsoVision).

CapsoVision keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −210% compared with −576% at Nano-X Imaging.

CapsoVision scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Nano-X Imaging), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCVNNOX
Size and price
Market cap$302M–
Share price$6.03$0.322
Change, 1 year8.8%−89.4%
Change, 5 years–−98.3%
Beta (5Y)−1.151.37
Employees99197
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score6 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S21.7×–
P/B11.4×–
FCF yield−9.7%–
Fair value$1.25–
Margin of safety−383%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)6.4%15.4% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin49.7% (better)−98.2%
Operating margin−212% (better)−601%
Net margin−210% (better)−576%
FCF margin−210% (better)−346%
Return on equity−125%−63.6% (better)
Return on invested capital−99.6%−59.5% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.04 (better)
Current ratio5.07 (better)2.84
Altman Z-score19.14–
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions10.2%13.9%
Held by insiders29.0%10.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months$21.0M (better)$190K
Short interest, % of float5.5%9.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.