StockData

CapsoVision vs Hyperfine

CV and HYPR side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CV and HYPR compare

CapsoVision is the larger company, worth 4.4 times as much as Hyperfine ($314M against $72.0M).

Hyperfine grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (80.0% versus 6.4% for CapsoVision).

Hyperfine keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −156% compared with −210% at CapsoVision.

Hyperfine scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for CapsoVision), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCVHYPR
Size and price
Market cap$314M$72.0M
Share price$6.27$0.679
Change, 1 year15.2%−38.2%
Change, 5 years–−93.2%
Beta (5Y)−1.091.03
Employees99102
StockData Score
Total score67 (better)
Valuation score02 (better)
Growth score03 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score6 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S22.5×3.8× (better)
P/B11.9×2.3× (better)
FCF yield−9.3% (better)−38.8%
Fair value$1.28$0.784
Margin of safety−391%13.4% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)6.4%80.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–115%
Profitability
Gross margin49.7%52.6% (better)
Operating margin−212%−168% (better)
Net margin−210%−156% (better)
FCF margin−210%−146% (better)
Return on equity−125%−102% (better)
Return on invested capital−99.6% (better)−403%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.42 (better)
Current ratio5.075.10 (better)
Altman Z-score20.27 (better)−7.51
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions10.2%20.6%
Held by insiders29.0%18.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months$21.0M (better)−$91.9K
Short interest, % of float5.5%4.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.