Cousins Properties vs Douglas Emmett
CUZ and DEI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CUZ and DEI compare
Cousins Properties is the larger company, worth 2.9 times as much as Douglas Emmett ($4.9B against $1.7B).
Cousins Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus 0.78% for Douglas Emmett).
Cousins Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.4% compared with −2.3% at Douglas Emmett.
Both pay dividends: Cousins Properties yields 4.3% and Douglas Emmett 7.5%.
Cousins Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Douglas Emmett), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CUZ | DEI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.9B | $1.7B |
| Share price | $29.55 | $10.13 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.4% | −20.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −26.0% | −71.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.92 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 351 | 778 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 328× | – |
| P/S | 4.6× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.3× | – |
| Fair value | $36.87 | $19.83 |
| Margin of safety | 19.8% | 48.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.5% (better) | 0.78% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.1% (better) | 2.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −74.2% (better) | −161% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −74.3% (better) | −168% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −31.6% | −20.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 68.4% (better) | 63.2% |
| Operating margin | 68.3% | – |
| Net margin | 1.4% (better) | −2.3% |
| Return on equity | 0.32% (better) | −1.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 4.0× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.04 (better) | 0.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.3% | 7.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 1445% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.3% (better) | −7.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.3% | 7.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 105% | 113% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 4.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$178K | $1.5M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.9% | 19.8% |
Go deeper
- CUZ stock overview
- CUZ income statement
- CUZ valuation and score
- DEI stock overview
- DEI income statement
- DEI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.