Torrid vs J.Jill
CURV and JILL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CURV and JILL compare
J.Jill is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Torrid ($356M against $243M).
J.Jill grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.2% versus −11.2% for Torrid).
J.Jill keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.6% compared with −0.94% at Torrid.
J.Jill pays a dividend yielding 1.5%; Torrid does not pay one.
J.Jill scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 3 for Torrid), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CURV | JILL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $243M | $356M |
| Share price | $2.44 | $23.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 80.7% | 55.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −87.3% | 22.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.20 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 5,685 | 3,140 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 13.4× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.6× |
| P/B | – | 2.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.3× | 5.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 7.3× |
| FCF yield | −5.5% | 13.7% (better) |
| Fair value | $1.36 | $26.18 |
| Margin of safety | −80.0% | 8.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −11.2% | −2.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 0.32% | 6.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −369% | −26.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −325% | −25.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.7% | 70.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.9% | 8.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.94% | 4.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | −1.4% | 8.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 20.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 30.8% | 31.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.52 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.16 (better) | −0.06 |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.79 | 1.30 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.56 | 2.13 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.5% |
| Payout ratio | – | 18.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Buyback yield | 0.11% | 2.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.11% | 3.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 90.3% | 50.2% |
| Held by insiders | 86.0% | 7.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$240K (better) | −$1.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 31.7% | 6.7% |
Go deeper
- CURV stock overview
- CURV income statement
- CURV valuation and score
- JILL stock overview
- JILL income statement
- JILL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.