Curbline Properties vs Terreno Realty
CURB and TRNO side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CURB and TRNO compare
Terreno Realty is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Curbline Properties ($7.1B against $3.3B).
On earnings, Terreno Realty is cheaper: it trades at 17.6× trailing earnings, against 106× for Curbline Properties.
Curbline Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (54.8% versus 18.0% for Terreno Realty).
Terreno Realty keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 77.3% compared with 13.1% at Curbline Properties.
Both pay dividends: Curbline Properties yields 2.5% and Terreno Realty 3.2%.
Terreno Realty scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for Curbline Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CURB | TRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $7.1B |
| Share price | $28.53 | $65.56 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.7% | 12.5% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −12.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 0.83 |
| Employees | – | 47 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 106× | 17.6× (better) |
| P/S | 14.6× | 14.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× (better) | 1.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.9× | – |
| PEG | 7.57 | 1.22 (better) |
| Fair value | $9.22 | $66.56 |
| Margin of safety | −209% | 1.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 54.8% (better) | 18.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 20.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 72.8% (better) | 52.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 68.8% (better) | 48.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 27.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 13.1% | 77.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.5% | 9.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Altman Z-score | 2.71 | 3.51 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% | 3.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 245% | 55.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 12.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | −4.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% (better) | −1.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 119% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 7.3% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$46.9M | −$1.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.8% | 6.0% |
Go deeper
- CURB stock overview
- CURB income statement
- CURB valuation and score
- TRNO stock overview
- TRNO income statement
- TRNO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.