Curbline Properties vs Innovative Industrial Properties
CURB and IIPR side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CURB and IIPR compare
Curbline Properties is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Innovative Industrial Properties ($3.3B against $1.4B).
On earnings, Innovative Industrial Properties is cheaper: it trades at 11.7× trailing earnings, against 106× for Curbline Properties.
Curbline Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (54.8% versus −8.4% for Innovative Industrial Properties).
Innovative Industrial Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 52.3% compared with 13.1% at Curbline Properties.
Both pay dividends: Curbline Properties yields 2.5% and Innovative Industrial Properties 14.6%.
Innovative Industrial Properties scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Curbline Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CURB | IIPR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $1.4B |
| Share price | $28.53 | $52.04 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.7% | 4.9% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −81.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.41 | 1.10 |
| Employees | – | 23 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 106× | 11.7× (better) |
| P/S | 14.6× | 5.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 20.9× | 5.9× (better) |
| PEG | 7.57 | – |
| Fair value | $9.22 | $73.91 |
| Margin of safety | −209% | 29.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 54.8% (better) | −8.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 17.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 72.8% (better) | 0.34% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 68.8% (better) | −4.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 3.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 51.4% |
| Net margin | 13.1% | 52.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.5% | 7.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 6.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 5.2× |
| Altman Z-score | 2.71 (better) | 1.45 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% | 14.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 245% | 157% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% | 17.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 119% | 75.8% |
| Held by insiders | 7.3% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$46.9M | $243K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.8% | 15.8% |
Go deeper
- CURB stock overview
- CURB income statement
- CURB valuation and score
- IIPR stock overview
- IIPR income statement
- IIPR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.