StockData

Culp vs Hooker Furnishings

CULP and HOFT side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CULP and HOFT compare

Hooker Furnishings is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as Culp ($158M against $44.1M).

Culp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.30% versus −32.8% for Hooker Furnishings).

Hooker Furnishings pays a dividend yielding 3.1%; Culp does not pay one.

Hooker Furnishings scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 3 for Culp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCULPHOFT
Size and price
Market cap$44.1M$158M
Share price$3.46$14.74
Change, 1 year−12.6%48.4%
Change, 5 years−69.6%−43.4%
Beta (5Y)0.640.83
Employees887840
StockData Score
Total score311 (better)
Valuation score12 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score00
Health score16 (better)
Dividend score02 (better)
Valuation
P/S0.2× (better)0.8×
P/B–0.9×
P/FCF–8.4×
FCF yield−3.0%11.9% (better)
Fair value–$14.90
Margin of safety–1.1%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−0.30% (better)−32.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−7.5% (better)−12.4%
Profitability
Gross margin16.1%38.5% (better)
Operating margin−1.0% (better)−6.0%
Net margin–−8.7%
FCF margin−0.63%9.1% (better)
Return on equity–−9.9%
Return on invested capital–−5.7%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−2.9×–
Current ratio1.813.03 (better)
Altman Z-score2.813.50 (better)
Piotroski F-score–4
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–3.1%
Years of dividend growth–0
Dividend growth, 5Y average–4.2%
Shareholder yield0.00%3.1% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions55.4%73.3%
Held by insiders31.3%9.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months$169K–
Short interest, % of float0.43%1.0%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.