StockData

Cue Biopharma vs Keros Therapeutics

CUE and KROS side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CUE and KROS compare

Keros Therapeutics is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Cue Biopharma ($189M against $136M).

Cue Biopharma grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (354% versus −83.4% for Keros Therapeutics).

Keros Therapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −153% compared with −436% at Cue Biopharma.

Keros Therapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Cue Biopharma), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCUEKROS
Size and price
Market cap$136M$189M
Share price$18.66$9.54
Change, 1 year−8.7%−44.0%
Change, 5 years−95.8%−84.1%
Beta (5Y)2.371.10
Employees2978
StockData Score
Total score89 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score11
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S3.6× (better)4.7×
P/B58.7×0.7× (better)
FCF yield−37.0%−25.5% (better)
Fair value–$24.96
Margin of safety–61.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)354% (better)−83.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average54.2%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−196%
EPS growth (TTM)–−282%
Profitability
Operating margin−262%−181% (better)
Net margin−436%−153% (better)
FCF margin−133%−119% (better)
Return on equity−1603%−12.6% (better)
Return on invested capital–−389%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio1.2518.14 (better)
Altman Z-score−30.322.05 (better)
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions22.6%101%
Held by insiders17.4%53.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$2.3M−$447K (better)
Short interest, % of float14.4%11.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.