CubeSmart vs CoreCivic
CUBE and CXW side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CUBE and CXW compare
CubeSmart is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as CoreCivic ($10.1B against $3.1B).
On earnings, CoreCivic is cheaper: it trades at 2.0× trailing earnings, against 29.8× for CubeSmart.
CoreCivic grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.9% versus 3.3% for CubeSmart).
CubeSmart pays a dividend yielding 4.7%; CoreCivic does not pay one.
CubeSmart scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for CoreCivic), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CUBE | CXW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.1B | $3.1B |
| Share price | $45.00 | $31.48 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.8% | 82.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −17.9% | 172% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 3,121 | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 29.8× | 2.0× (better) |
| P/S | 8.8× | 1.2× (better) |
| P/B | 4.1× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 1.5× |
| PEG | 7.07 | 1.28 (better) |
| FCF yield | – | −12.7% |
| Fair value | $35.76 | – |
| Margin of safety | −25.8% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.3% | 26.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.6% (better) | 3.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −3.2% | 1466% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.4% | 19.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 67.6% | – |
| FCF margin | – | −14.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.27 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 0.03 |
| Current ratio | – | 2.41 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.28 | 2.77 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 9.5% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 21.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.7% | 21.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 87.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.88% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.9M (better) | −$18.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | 13.1% |
Go deeper
- CUBE stock overview
- CUBE income statement
- CUBE valuation and score
- CXW stock overview
- CXW income statement
- CXW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.