CTW vs Gamehaus
CTW and GMHS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CTW and GMHS compare
CTW grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−8.7% versus −11.3% for Gamehaus).
Gamehaus keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.1% compared with −5.0% at CTW.
Gamehaus scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for CTW), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CTW | GMHS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.44 | $0.798 |
| Change, 1 year | −41.0% | −26.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.6% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | −0.70 | −0.12 |
| Employees | 137 | 143 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.7% (better) | −11.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −208% | 8.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −217% | 0.00% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 65.5% (better) | 52.7% |
| Operating margin | −8.9% | 1.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.0% | 4.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | −4.3% | 5.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | −13.4% | 11.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −33.0% | 8.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.02 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −6.97 |
| Current ratio | 1.57 | 2.84 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 96.0% | 76.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.5K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.80% | 1.1% |
Go deeper
- CTW stock overview
- CTW income statement
- CTW valuation and score
- GMHS stock overview
- GMHS income statement
- GMHS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.