StockData

Cytosorbents vs Utah Medical Products

CTSO and UTMD side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CTSO and UTMD compare

Cytosorbents is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Utah Medical Products ($336M against $233M).

Utah Medical Products pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Cytosorbents does not pay one.

Utah Medical Products scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 2 for Cytosorbents), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCTSOUTMD
Size and price
Market cap$336M$233M
Share price$5.34$73.03
Change, 1 year−63.0%27.5%
Change, 5 years−94.9%−36.8%
Beta (5Y)0.960.48
Employees129140
StockData Score
Total score210 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score11
Health score04 (better)
Dividend score02 (better)
Valuation
P/E–22.3×
P/S9.0×6.4× (better)
P/B–1.9×
EV/EBITDA–14.1×
P/FCF–20.3×
FCF yield−2.8%4.9% (better)
Fair value–$76.45
Margin of safety–4.5%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.1%–
Revenue growth, 5Y average−2.0%−1.8% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average–3.4%
Profitability
Gross margin71.6% (better)57.9%
Operating margin−34.7%28.4% (better)
Net margin−48.9%–
FCF margin−25.0%31.7% (better)
Return on equity−336%–
Return on invested capital−73.4%23.9% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Net debt / EBITDA–−8.51
Current ratio0.6648.62 (better)
Altman Z-score−7.0757.94 (better)
Piotroski F-score3–
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–1.7%
Buyback yield–0.80%
Shareholder yield0.00%2.5% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions1.3%72.8%
Held by insiders2.5%7.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months$269K (better)$66.8K
Short interest, % of float0.22%5.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.