StockData

Cytosorbents vs Orchestra BioMed

CTSO and OBIO side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CTSO and OBIO compare

Cytosorbents and Orchestra BioMed are about the same size, with market caps of $336M and $361M.

Orchestra BioMed grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1007% versus 3.1% for Cytosorbents).

Cytosorbents keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −48.9% compared with −183% at Orchestra BioMed.

Orchestra BioMed scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 2 for Cytosorbents), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCTSOOBIO
Size and price
Market cap$336M$361M
Share price$5.34$6.01
Change, 1 year−63.0%59.0%
Change, 5 years−94.9%−39.0%
Beta (5Y)0.960.80
Employees12986
StockData Score
Total score29 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score11
Health score05 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S9.0× (better)11.6×
FCF yield−2.8% (better)−17.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)3.1%1007% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−2.0%–
Profitability
Gross margin71.6%99.6% (better)
Operating margin−34.7% (better)−195%
Net margin−48.9% (better)−183%
FCF margin−25.0% (better)−206%
Return on equity−336%–
Return on invested capital−73.4%–
Financial health
Current ratio0.667.25 (better)
Altman Z-score−7.07−3.68 (better)
Piotroski F-score36 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions1.3%46.1%
Held by insiders2.5%56.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months$269K (better)$50.4K
Short interest, % of float0.22%10.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.