StockData

Castor Maritime vs Performance Shipping

CTRM and PSHG side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CTRM and PSHG compare

Castor Maritime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (23.5% versus −3.7% for Performance Shipping).

Performance Shipping keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 59.4% compared with 23.6% at Castor Maritime.

Performance Shipping scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 3 for Castor Maritime), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCTRMPSHG
Size and price
Share price$1.55$1.63
Change, 1 year−25.1%−18.9%
Change, 5 years−93.4%−98.0%
Beta (5Y)0.880.10
Employees1201,000
StockData Score
Total score38 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score16 (better)
Health score12 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)23.5% (better)−3.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average45.6% (better)14.9%
Net income growth (TTM)31.8% (better)14.3%
EPS growth (TTM)−5.3%15.3% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average–−39.5%
Profitability
Gross margin73.0%–
Operating margin−22.5%61.7% (better)
Net margin23.6%59.4% (better)
Return on equity3.6%15.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−3.9%18.0% (better)
Financial health
Interest coverage−3.7×7.6× (better)
Current ratio4.68 (better)3.91
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Ownership
Held by insiders0.12%7.4%
Short interest, % of float0.04%3.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.