Castor Maritime vs Globus Maritime
CTRM and GLBS side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CTRM and GLBS compare
Globus Maritime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.8% versus 23.5% for Castor Maritime).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CTRM | GLBS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.55 | $2.89 |
| Change, 1 year | −25.1% | 160% |
| Change, 5 years | −93.4% | 0.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 0.63 |
| Employees | 120 | 25 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 23.5% | 26.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 45.6% (better) | 30.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 31.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −5.3% (better) | −500% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 73.0% | – |
| Operating margin | −22.5% | 10.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 23.6% | – |
| FCF margin | – | 25.7% |
| Return on equity | 3.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −3.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.68 |
| Interest coverage | −3.7× | 0.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 4.68 (better) | 2.77 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 3.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.12% | 36.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $1.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.04% | 6.1% |
Go deeper
- CTRM stock overview
- CTRM income statement
- CTRM valuation and score
- GLBS stock overview
- GLBS income statement
- GLBS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.