StockData

Custom Truck One Source vs EquipmentShare.com

CTOS and EQPT side by side, both in miscellaneous equipment rental and leasing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CTOS and EQPT compare

EquipmentShare.com is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Custom Truck One Source ($3.9B against $2.3B).

Custom Truck One Source keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.4% compared with 1.4% at EquipmentShare.com.

Custom Truck One Source scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 1 for EquipmentShare.com), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCTOSEQPT
Size and price
Market cap$2.3B$3.9B
Share price$10.00$15.42
Change, 1 year66.9%–
Change, 5 years18.2%–
Beta (5Y)1.37–
Employees2,5008,206
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)1
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E76.9×–
P/S1.1×0.7× (better)
P/B2.8× (better)3.1×
EV/EBITDA8.8× (better)9.3×
Fair value$6.16$13.85
Margin of safety−62.3%−11.4% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)5.8%–
Revenue growth, 5Y average45.1%–
Profitability
Gross margin22.6%29.2% (better)
Operating margin8.2% (better)7.1%
Net margin1.4% (better)1.4%
Return on equity3.7%8.3% (better)
Return on invested capital6.9% (better)6.8%
Financial health
Debt / equity2.01 (better)3.38
Net debt / EBITDA3.70 (better)4.63
Interest coverage–1.3×
Current ratio1.282.45 (better)
Altman Z-score1.071.45 (better)
Piotroski F-score56 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield0.00%–
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions98.3%42.6%
Held by insiders73.8%43.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$39.9M
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float5.9%11.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.