CTO Realty Growth vs TPG RE Finance Trust
CTO and TRTX side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CTO and TRTX compare
CTO Realty Growth is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as TPG RE Finance Trust ($739M against $499M).
On earnings, TPG RE Finance Trust is cheaper: it trades at 12.0× trailing earnings, against 14.5× for CTO Realty Growth.
CTO Realty Growth grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.3% versus −2.6% for TPG RE Finance Trust).
TPG RE Finance Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 40.2% compared with 32.6% at CTO Realty Growth.
Both pay dividends: CTO Realty Growth yields 7.7% and TPG RE Finance Trust 14.8%.
CTO Realty Growth scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 15 for TPG RE Finance Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CTO | TRTX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $739M | $499M |
| Share price | $19.71 | $6.50 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.4% | −25.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 4.7% | −51.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 42 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.5× | 12.0× (better) |
| P/S | 4.6× | 3.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× | 0.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.9× | – |
| Fair value | $30.67 | $11.20 |
| Margin of safety | 35.7% | 42.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.3% (better) | −2.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.5% (better) | −3.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −13.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −16.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −57.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 38.7% | – |
| Net margin | 32.6% | 40.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.5% (better) | 5.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.03 (better) | −0.10 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.7% | 14.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 97.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −4.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 5.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.7% | 19.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.7% | 76.1% |
| Held by insiders | 4.1% | 7.1% |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | 9.1% |
Go deeper
- CTO stock overview
- CTO income statement
- CTO valuation and score
- TRTX stock overview
- TRTX income statement
- TRTX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.