CTO Realty Growth vs NexPoint Diversified Real Estate Trust
CTO and NXDT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CTO and NXDT compare
CTO Realty Growth is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as NexPoint Diversified Real Estate Trust ($739M against $210M).
CTO Realty Growth grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.3% versus −20.5% for NexPoint Diversified Real Estate Trust).
CTO Realty Growth keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 32.6% compared with −94.2% at NexPoint Diversified Real Estate Trust.
Both pay dividends: CTO Realty Growth yields 7.7% and NexPoint Diversified Real Estate Trust 12.1%.
CTO Realty Growth scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for NexPoint Diversified Real Estate Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CTO | NXDT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $739M | $210M |
| Share price | $19.71 | $3.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.4% | 21.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 4.7% | −73.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 42 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.5× | – |
| P/S | 4.6× | 2.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.9× (better) | 12.6× |
| Fair value | $30.67 | $5.00 |
| Margin of safety | 35.7% (better) | 20.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.3% (better) | −20.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −57.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 38.7% (better) | −1.6% |
| Net margin | 32.6% (better) | −94.2% |
| Return on equity | 8.5% (better) | −10.3% |
| Return on invested capital | 10.0% (better) | −0.14% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.2× (better) | −0.1× |
| Altman Z-score | 1.03 (better) | −0.08 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.7% | 12.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 97.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.7% | 14.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.7% | 51.1% |
| Held by insiders | 4.1% | 26.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $272K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | 2.3% |
Go deeper
- CTO stock overview
- CTO income statement
- CTO valuation and score
- NXDT stock overview
- NXDT income statement
- NXDT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.