CTO Realty Growth vs Four Corners Property Trust
CTO and FCPT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CTO and FCPT compare
Four Corners Property Trust is the larger company, worth 3.3 times as much as CTO Realty Growth ($2.5B against $739M).
On earnings, CTO Realty Growth is cheaper: it trades at 14.5× trailing earnings, against 20.6× for Four Corners Property Trust.
CTO Realty Growth grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.3% versus 10.2% for Four Corners Property Trust).
Four Corners Property Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 37.5% compared with 32.6% at CTO Realty Growth.
Both pay dividends: CTO Realty Growth yields 7.7% and Four Corners Property Trust 4.9%.
CTO Realty Growth scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Four Corners Property Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CTO | FCPT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $739M | $2.5B |
| Share price | $19.71 | $22.47 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.4% | −4.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 4.7% | −24.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.57 | 0.44 |
| Employees | 42 | 496 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.5× (better) | 20.6× |
| P/S | 4.6× (better) | 7.8× |
| P/B | 1.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.9× | – |
| Fair value | $30.67 | $24.60 |
| Margin of safety | 35.7% (better) | 8.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.3% (better) | 10.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.5% (better) | 11.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 8.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 0.00% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −57.2% | 0.18% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 38.7% | – |
| Net margin | 32.6% | 37.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 10.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.03 (better) | 0.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.7% (better) | 4.9% |
| Payout ratio | 97.2% | 155% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | −5.7% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.7% (better) | −0.84% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 66.7% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 4.1% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $547K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.3% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- CTO stock overview
- CTO income statement
- CTO valuation and score
- FCPT stock overview
- FCPT income statement
- FCPT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.