Castellum vs Mastech Digital
CTM and MHH side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CTM and MHH compare
Mastech Digital is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as Castellum ($75.4M against $41.6M).
Castellum grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.5% versus −13.6% for Mastech Digital).
Mastech Digital keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.67% compared with −5.7% at Castellum.
Mastech Digital scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 11 for Castellum), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CTM | MHH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $41.6M | $75.4M |
| Share price | $0.439 | $6.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −60.1% | −15.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −90.0% | −66.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.54 | 0.83 |
| Employees | – | 11 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 69.7× |
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.4× |
| P/FCF | 113× | 13.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.88% | 7.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $0.667 | $8.73 |
| Margin of safety | 34.2% (better) | 28.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.5% (better) | −13.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 31.7% (better) | −2.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −43.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.9% (better) | 28.2% |
| Operating margin | −6.8% | 0.44% (better) |
| Net margin | −5.7% | 0.67% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.66% | 3.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −8.6% | 1.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −15.0% | 0.68% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 4.94 (better) | 4.27 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.01 | 5.36 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −0.06% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −0.06% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 8.3% | 19.2% |
| Held by insiders | 28.3% | 11.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$307K | $259K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.6% | 0.37% |
Go deeper
- CTM stock overview
- CTM income statement
- CTM valuation and score
- MHH stock overview
- MHH income statement
- MHH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.