Qwest vs Lumen Technologies
CTGG and LUMN side by side, both in telephone communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CTGG and LUMN compare
Lumen Technologies is the larger company, worth 377603151 times as much as Qwest ($5.0B against $13).
Lumen Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−7.7% versus −14.3% for Qwest).
Lumen Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −8.7% compared with −40.1% at Qwest.
Qwest pays a dividend yielding 2.7%; Lumen Technologies does not pay one.
Qwest scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Lumen Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CTGG | LUMN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13 | $5.0B |
| Share price | $13.33 | $4.88 |
| Change, 1 year | – | −55.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −65.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | – | 1.20 |
| Employees | 9,100 | 24K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.4× |
| P/B | 0.0× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 5.7× |
| P/FCF | 0.0× (better) | 6.0× |
| FCF yield | 6279070000% (better) | 16.6% |
| Fair value | $13669800000.00 | $8.74 |
| Margin of safety | 100% (better) | 44.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −14.3% | −7.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −8.3% (better) | −9.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −230% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.7% (better) | 47.8% |
| Operating margin | −29.5% | 1.7% (better) |
| Net margin | −40.1% | −8.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 18.3% (better) | 7.1% |
| Return on equity | −15.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −8.0% | 1.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.16 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.94 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.2× |
| Current ratio | 6.96 (better) | 0.96 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.36 (better) | −0.42 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 70.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 2.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $758K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 6.6% |
Go deeper
- CTGG stock overview
- CTGG income statement
- CTGG valuation and score
- LUMN stock overview
- LUMN income statement
- LUMN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.