Carriage Services vs Service Corp International
CSV and SCI side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CSV and SCI compare
Service Corp International is the larger company, worth 19 times as much as Carriage Services ($10.4B against $554M).
On earnings, Carriage Services is cheaper: it trades at 12.5× trailing earnings, against 19.0× for Service Corp International.
Service Corp International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.0% versus 2.4% for Carriage Services).
Service Corp International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.7% compared with 10.7% at Carriage Services.
Both pay dividends: Carriage Services yields 1.3% and Service Corp International 1.8%.
Carriage Services scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 14 for Service Corp International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CSV | SCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $554M | $10.4B |
| Share price | $34.89 | $76.37 |
| Change, 1 year | −21.0% | −4.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −28.8% | 14.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 0.55 |
| Employees | 2,321 | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.5× (better) | 19.0× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 2.4× |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 6.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.8× (better) | 15.4× |
| P/FCF | 14.8× (better) | 15.3× |
| PEG | 1.70 (better) | 7.62 |
| FCF yield | 6.8% (better) | 6.5% |
| Fair value | $47.41 | $66.83 |
| Margin of safety | 26.4% (better) | −14.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.4% | 3.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.8% (better) | 4.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −14.9% | 5.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −16.2% | 8.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 29.6% (better) | 5.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.1% (better) | 25.9% |
| Operating margin | 21.9% | 22.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.7% | 12.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.0% | 15.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 17.3% | 35.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 27.6% (better) | 11.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 (better) | 3.28 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.03 (better) | 4.98 |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× | 3.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.46 (better) | 0.40 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.18 (better) | 0.76 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 1.8% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.9% | 34.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.3% | 5.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.0% | 94.8% |
| Held by insiders | 2.1% | 2.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$39.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- CSV stock overview
- CSV income statement
- CSV valuation and score
- SCI stock overview
- SCI income statement
- SCI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.