StockData

Castle Biosciences vs Exagen

CSTL and XGN side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CSTL and XGN compare

Castle Biosciences is the larger company, worth 10 times as much as Exagen ($1.0B against $100M).

Exagen grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.7% versus 9.8% for Castle Biosciences).

Castle Biosciences keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.1% compared with −25.1% at Exagen.

Castle Biosciences scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 4 for Exagen), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCSTLXGN
Size and price
Market cap$1.0B$100M
Share price$33.79$4.13
Change, 1 year−3.0%−56.9%
Change, 5 years−28.9%−65.9%
Beta (5Y)1.381.18
Employees883220
StockData Score
Total score11 (better)4
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score4 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S2.7×1.4× (better)
P/B2.2× (better)7.3×
P/FCF260×–
FCF yield0.38% (better)−13.0%
Fair value$34.71$3.60
Margin of safety2.6% (better)−14.7%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)9.8%13.7% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average40.6% (better)9.7%
Profitability
Gross margin77.1% (better)58.7%
Operating margin−7.4% (better)−20.1%
Net margin−6.1% (better)−25.1%
FCF margin1.1% (better)−18.0%
Return on equity−4.9% (better)−114%
Return on invested capital−11.1% (better)−167%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.02 (better)1.66
Interest coverage−51.2×−2.9× (better)
Current ratio5.28 (better)3.46
Altman Z-score6.63 (better)−5.71
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.00%–
Years of dividend growth0–
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions89.5%34.1%
Held by insiders1.9%29.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$18.3M−$22.9K (better)
Short interest, % of float7.0%4.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.