Caesarstone vs Lifetime Brands
CSTE and LCUT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CSTE and LCUT compare
Lifetime Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.5% versus −10.4% for Caesarstone).
Lifetime Brands keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.8% compared with −34.6% at Caesarstone.
Lifetime Brands pays a dividend yielding 2.5%; Caesarstone does not pay one.
Lifetime Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 3 for Caesarstone), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CSTE | LCUT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $194M |
| Share price | $1.72 | $8.46 |
| Change, 1 year | 47.0% | 135% |
| Change, 5 years | −87.1% | −55.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 1,266 | 1,080 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 5.9× |
| P/S | – | 0.3× |
| P/B | – | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 2.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 9.4× |
| FCF yield | – | 10.7% |
| Fair value | – | $24.46 |
| Margin of safety | – | 65.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −10.4% | −1.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −4.0% | −3.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.4% | 43.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | −31.6% | 8.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −34.6% | 4.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −11.8% | 3.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | −66.9% | 15.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −43.8% | 24.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.19 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −0.07 |
| Interest coverage | −1821.9× | 3.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.83 | 2.11 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.93 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.5% |
| Payout ratio | – | 12.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 5.9% | 43.4% |
| Held by insiders | 40.8% | 47.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.2K (better) | −$355K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.40% | 12.0% |
Go deeper
- CSTE stock overview
- CSTE income statement
- CSTE valuation and score
- LCUT stock overview
- LCUT income statement
- LCUT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.