Caesarstone vs InMode
CSTE and INMD side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CSTE and INMD compare
InMode grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−6.2% versus −10.4% for Caesarstone).
InMode scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for Caesarstone), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CSTE | INMD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.72 | $13.22 |
| Change, 1 year | 47.0% | −11.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −87.1% | −85.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 1.43 |
| Employees | 1,266 | 660 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −10.4% | −6.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −4.0% | 12.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −36.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 9.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 18.4% | 78.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −31.6% | 23.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −34.6% | – |
| FCF margin | −11.8% | 22.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −66.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −43.8% | 25.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.19 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −1821.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.83 | 9.88 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 5.9% | 49.5% |
| Held by insiders | 40.8% | 12.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$11.2K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.40% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- CSTE stock overview
- CSTE income statement
- CSTE valuation and score
- INMD stock overview
- INMD income statement
- INMD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.