Centerspace vs UMH Properties
CSR and UMH side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CSR and UMH compare
UMH Properties is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Centerspace ($1.2B against $956M).
On earnings, Centerspace is cheaper: it trades at 10.7× trailing earnings, against 291× for UMH Properties.
UMH Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus −6.0% for Centerspace).
Both pay dividends: Centerspace yields 5.4% and UMH Properties 6.2%.
Centerspace scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for UMH Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CSR | UMH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $956M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $56.94 | $14.55 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.7% | −4.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −43.8% | −37.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 0.61 |
| Employees | 349 | 540 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.7× (better) | 291× |
| P/S | 3.7× (better) | 4.5× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.9× | – |
| Fair value | $129.09 | $13.80 |
| Margin of safety | 55.9% (better) | −5.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −6.0% | 8.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.0% | 9.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 199% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 198% (better) | −37.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 96.6% | – |
| Operating margin | 56.1% | – |
| Net margin | 35.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 11.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 16.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 3.5× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.62 | 0.98 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.4% | 6.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 56.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.9% | 4.3% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.42% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.4% | 5.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.1% | 76.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.67% | 10.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $121K (better) | $118K |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.8% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- CSR stock overview
- CSR income statement
- CSR valuation and score
- UMH stock overview
- UMH income statement
- UMH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.