StockData

Champions Oncology vs Sutro Biopharma

CSBR and STRO side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CSBR and STRO compare

Sutro Biopharma is the larger company, worth 2.6 times as much as Champions Oncology ($170M against $66.5M).

Champions Oncology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.7% versus −56.3% for Sutro Biopharma).

Champions Oncology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.8% compared with −395% at Sutro Biopharma.

Champions Oncology scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Sutro Biopharma), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCSBRSTRO
Size and price
Market cap$66.5M$170M
Share price$4.78$10.26
Change, 1 year−29.5%27.3%
Change, 5 years−49.0%−94.2%
Beta (5Y)0.362.21
Employees214137
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)7
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score55
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.1× (better)3.7×
P/B17.1×–
EV/EBITDA216×–
FCF yield−9.2%–
Fair value$1.36–
Margin of safety−251%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)6.7% (better)−56.3%
Revenue growth, 5Y average7.7%19.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−138%–
EPS growth (TTM)−140%–
Profitability
Gross margin49.8%–
Operating margin−1.7% (better)−320%
Net margin−1.8% (better)−395%
FCF margin−10.1%–
Return on equity−29.8%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Current ratio1.033.32 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.30 (better)−8.74
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions42.4%99.4%
Held by insiders30.5%6.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$0
Short interest, % of float0.75%14.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.