Cirrus Logic vs Sonos
CRUS and SONO side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRUS and SONO compare
Cirrus Logic is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as Sonos ($6.0B against $2.1B).
On earnings, Cirrus Logic is cheaper: it trades at 15.2× trailing earnings, against 39.9× for Sonos.
Sonos grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.6% versus 5.1% for Cirrus Logic).
Cirrus Logic keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.2% compared with 3.8% at Sonos.
Cirrus Logic scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 13 for Sonos), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRUS | SONO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.0B | $2.1B |
| Share price | $120.19 | $17.97 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.0% | 5.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 47.2% | −43.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 1.50 |
| Employees | 1,668 | 1,404 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.2× (better) | 39.9× |
| P/S | 2.9× | 1.4× (better) |
| P/B | 2.7× (better) | 5.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.3× (better) | 16.5× |
| P/FCF | 11.4× (better) | 17.0× |
| PEG | 0.42 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.7% (better) | 5.9% |
| Fair value | $174.32 | $16.07 |
| Margin of safety | 31.1% (better) | −11.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.1% | 5.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% (better) | 1.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.6% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.1% (better) | 46.5% |
| Operating margin | 22.5% (better) | 4.4% |
| Net margin | 20.2% (better) | 3.8% |
| FCF margin | 25.7% (better) | 8.4% |
| Return on equity | 19.5% (better) | 14.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 26.1% | 26.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 452× (better) | 144× |
| Current ratio | 6.41 (better) | 1.61 |
| Altman Z-score | 11.16 (better) | 4.88 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 5.0% | 5.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 102% |
| Held by insiders | 0.64% | 18.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.4M | $45.0M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.6% | 17.1% |
Go deeper
- CRUS stock overview
- CRUS income statement
- CRUS valuation and score
- SONO stock overview
- SONO income statement
- SONO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.