Cirrus Logic vs OSI Systems
CRUS and OSIS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRUS and OSIS compare
Cirrus Logic is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as OSI Systems ($6.0B against $3.0B).
On earnings, Cirrus Logic is cheaper: it trades at 15.2× trailing earnings, against 20.7× for OSI Systems.
Cirrus Logic grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.1% versus 2.9% for OSI Systems).
Cirrus Logic keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.2% compared with 8.8% at OSI Systems.
Cirrus Logic scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 15 for OSI Systems), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRUS | OSIS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.0B | $3.0B |
| Share price | $120.19 | $192.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −1.0% | −31.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 47.2% | 103% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 1,668 | 7,806 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.2× (better) | 20.7× |
| P/S | 2.9× | 1.7× (better) |
| P/B | 2.7× (better) | 3.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.3× (better) | 14.3× |
| P/FCF | 11.4× (better) | 11.5× |
| PEG | 0.42 (better) | 1.10 |
| FCF yield | 8.7% (better) | 8.7% |
| Fair value | $174.32 | $234.57 |
| Margin of safety | 31.1% (better) | 17.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.1% (better) | 2.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% | 9.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.0% (better) | 4.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.6% (better) | 5.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.7% | 17.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.1% (better) | 32.9% |
| Operating margin | 22.5% (better) | 12.2% |
| Net margin | 20.2% (better) | 8.8% |
| FCF margin | 25.7% (better) | 14.7% |
| Return on equity | 19.5% (better) | 18.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 26.1% (better) | 12.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.28 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.67 |
| Interest coverage | 452× (better) | 9.9× |
| Current ratio | 6.41 (better) | 2.89 |
| Altman Z-score | 11.16 (better) | 3.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 5.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 121% |
| Held by insiders | 0.64% | 6.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.4M | −$10.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.6% | 13.1% |
Go deeper
- CRUS stock overview
- CRUS income statement
- CRUS valuation and score
- OSIS stock overview
- OSIS income statement
- OSIS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.