Cirrus Logic vs Diodes
CRUS and DIOD side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRUS and DIOD compare
Cirrus Logic is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Diodes ($6.1B against $4.2B).
On earnings, Cirrus Logic is cheaper: it trades at 15.3× trailing earnings, against 36.8× for Diodes.
Diodes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.2% versus 5.1% for Cirrus Logic).
Cirrus Logic keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.2% compared with 6.5% at Diodes.
Cirrus Logic scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 12 for Diodes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRUS | DIOD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.1B | $4.2B |
| Share price | $121.71 | $91.60 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.1% | 95.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 49.0% | −16.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 1.62 |
| Employees | 1,668 | 7,989 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.3× (better) | 36.8× |
| P/S | 3.0× | 2.4× (better) |
| P/B | 2.8× | 2.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.5× (better) | 28.7× |
| P/FCF | 11.6× (better) | 34.1× |
| PEG | 0.42 | – |
| FCF yield | 8.6% (better) | 2.9% |
| Fair value | $177.04 | $74.49 |
| Margin of safety | 31.3% (better) | −23.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.1% | 24.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% (better) | 3.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.0% | 80.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 12.6% | 80.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.7% (better) | −5.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.1% (better) | 33.3% |
| Operating margin | 22.5% (better) | 7.3% |
| Net margin | 20.2% (better) | 6.5% |
| FCF margin | 25.7% (better) | 7.0% |
| Return on equity | 19.5% (better) | 6.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 26.1% (better) | 7.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −4.42 |
| Interest coverage | 452× (better) | 41.4× |
| Current ratio | 6.41 (better) | 3.07 |
| Altman Z-score | 11.28 (better) | 3.49 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 99.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.64% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.4M (better) | −$16.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.6% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- CRUS stock overview
- CRUS income statement
- CRUS valuation and score
- DIOD stock overview
- DIOD income statement
- DIOD valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.