StockData

Crocs vs On

CROX and ONON side by side, both in rubber and miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CROX and ONON compare

On grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (30.0% versus 0.70% for Crocs).

Crocs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.2% compared with 6.8% at On.

Crocs scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for On), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCROXONON
Size and price
Market cap$7.2B–
Share price$150.52$33.78
Change, 1 year77.7%−14.0%
Change, 5 years−16.5%−13.8%
Beta (5Y)1.291.77
Employees8,0102,000
StockData Score
Total score14 (better)7
Valuation score4 (better)0
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score4 (better)2
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E11.2×–
P/S1.8×–
P/B5.4×–
EV/EBITDA8.3×–
P/FCF9.6×–
FCF yield10.4%–
Fair value$205.39–
Margin of safety26.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)0.70%30.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average23.9%47.9% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)264% (better)−15.9%
EPS growth (TTM)337%–
Profitability
Gross margin59.4%62.8% (better)
Operating margin22.6% (better)12.5%
Net margin16.2% (better)6.8%
FCF margin18.4% (better)9.5%
Return on equity49.1%–
Return on invested capital29.0%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.96–
Net debt / EBITDA1.12–
Interest coverage11.5×12.7× (better)
Current ratio1.442.83 (better)
Altman Z-score4.56–
Piotroski F-score46 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield9.5%–
Shareholder yield9.5%–
Ownership
Held by institutions101%70.6%
Held by insiders5.0%37.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$9.4M$9.6M (better)
Superinvestors holding5 (better)2
Short interest, % of float10.9%–

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.