StockData

Cronos vs Glass House Brands

CRON and GLAS side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CRON and GLAS compare

Cronos grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (55.8% versus −9.4% for Glass House Brands).

Cronos keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.0% compared with −16.3% at Glass House Brands.

Cronos scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for Glass House Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCRONGLAS
Size and price
Market cap$1.3B–
Share price$3.45$1.87
Change, 1 year34.8%−75.9%
Change, 5 years−30.0%−58.9%
Beta (5Y)0.850.73
Employees610472
StockData Score
Total score15 (better)5
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score3 (better)1
Performance score33
Health score6 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E20.3×–
P/S6.2×–
P/B1.2×–
EV/EBITDA38.3×–
P/FCF19.4×–
FCF yield5.1%–
Fair value$3.66–
Margin of safety5.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)55.8% (better)−9.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average25.7%30.4% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)60.2% (better)−5815%
EPS growth (TTM)70.0%–
Profitability
Gross margin46.6% (better)42.3%
Operating margin3.4% (better)−9.1%
Net margin28.0% (better)−16.3%
FCF margin31.7% (better)−8.6%
Return on equity5.4% (better)−31.2%
Return on invested capital2.4% (better)−9.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.93 (better)
Interest coverage–−2.3×
Current ratio12.71 (better)1.78
Altman Z-score11.97–
Piotroski F-score7 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield3.7%–
Shareholder yield3.7%–
Ownership
Held by institutions12.9%24.9%
Held by insiders7.0%0.04%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$354K
Short interest, % of float1.2%0.82%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.