Ceragon Networks vs Vistance Networks
CRNT and VISN side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRNT and VISN compare
Vistance Networks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.9% versus −14.1% for Ceragon Networks).
Vistance Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 504% compared with −0.62% at Ceragon Networks.
Vistance Networks pays a dividend yielding 389%; Ceragon Networks does not pay one.
Vistance Networks scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for Ceragon Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRNT | VISN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $978M |
| Share price | $2.39 | $4.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.8% | −76.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −15.2% | −56.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 1.73 |
| Employees | 50 | 4,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 0.1× |
| P/S | – | 0.6× |
| P/B | – | 0.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 1.7× |
| FCF yield | – | −10.8% |
| Fair value | – | $18.72 |
| Margin of safety | – | 77.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −14.1% | 10.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% (better) | −25.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −109% | 780% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −107% | 956% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.8% | 42.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.1% | 2.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.62% | 504% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.3% (better) | −6.5% |
| Return on equity | −1.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 2.3% (better) | 1.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.07 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.06 | −4.05 |
| Interest coverage | 1.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.85 | 4.00 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.20 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 389% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 389% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 23.5% | 100% |
| Held by insiders | 12.0% | 26.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$32.6K (better) | −$202K |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.1% | 23.1% |
Go deeper
- CRNT stock overview
- CRNT income statement
- CRNT valuation and score
- VISN stock overview
- VISN income statement
- VISN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.