Ceragon Networks vs Ubiquiti
CRNT and UI side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRNT and UI compare
Ubiquiti grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.2% versus −14.1% for Ceragon Networks).
Ubiquiti keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.3% compared with −0.62% at Ceragon Networks.
Ubiquiti pays a dividend yielding 0.60%; Ceragon Networks does not pay one.
Ubiquiti scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 6 for Ceragon Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRNT | UI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $34.1B |
| Share price | $2.06 | $563.81 |
| Change, 1 year | −19.5% | −27.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −36.4% | 82.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.07 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 50 | 1,321 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 35.6× |
| P/S | – | 10.4× |
| P/B | – | 23.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 27.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 37.5× |
| PEG | – | 1.08 |
| FCF yield | – | 2.7% |
| Fair value | – | $554.02 |
| Margin of safety | – | −1.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −14.1% | 27.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | 11.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −109% | 34.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −107% | 34.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.8% | 46.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.1% | 36.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.62% | 29.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.3% | 27.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −1.2% | 91.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.3% | 120% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.07 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.06 | −0.51 |
| Interest coverage | 1.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.85 | 2.93 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 31.85 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.60% |
| Payout ratio | – | 20.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.60% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 23.5% | 4.9% |
| Held by insiders | 11.8% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$32.6K (better) | −$542K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.70% | 0.61% |
Go deeper
- CRNT stock overview
- CRNT income statement
- CRNT valuation and score
- UI stock overview
- UI income statement
- UI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.