Ceragon Networks vs Turtle Beach
CRNT and TBCH side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRNT and TBCH compare
Turtle Beach grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−13.0% versus −14.1% for Ceragon Networks).
Turtle Beach keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.17% compared with −0.62% at Ceragon Networks.
Turtle Beach scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for Ceragon Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRNT | TBCH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $292M |
| Share price | $2.39 | $16.29 |
| Change, 1 year | 5.8% | 6.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −15.2% | −39.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 1.79 |
| Employees | 50 | 290 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 1.0× |
| P/B | – | 3.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 27.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 7.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 14.0% |
| Fair value | – | $8.20 |
| Margin of safety | – | −98.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −14.1% | −13.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% (better) | −2.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −109% | −103% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −107% (better) | −108% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −20.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.8% | 36.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.1% | 3.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −0.62% | −0.17% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.3% | 13.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −1.2% | −0.53% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.3% | 4.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.07 (better) | 0.93 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.06 | 5.20 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.85 | 1.94 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.09 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 10.0% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 10.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 23.5% | 73.9% |
| Held by insiders | 12.0% | 17.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$32.6K (better) | −$4.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.1% | 24.5% |
Go deeper
- CRNT stock overview
- CRNT income statement
- CRNT valuation and score
- TBCH stock overview
- TBCH income statement
- TBCH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.