StockData

Ceragon Networks vs Planet Labs PBC

CRNT and PL side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CRNT and PL compare

Planet Labs PBC grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (44.1% versus −14.1% for Ceragon Networks).

Ceragon Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.62% compared with −95.1% at Planet Labs PBC.

Ceragon Networks scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 4 for Planet Labs PBC), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCRNTPL
Size and price
Market cap–$5.2B
Share price$2.52$14.34
Change, 1 year10.5%7.1%
Change, 5 years−10.6%25.8%
Beta (5Y)1.042.02
Employees501,000
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score03 (better)
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score3 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–13.8×
P/B–9.2×
P/FCF–211×
FCF yield–0.47%
Fair value–$3.87
Margin of safety–−270%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−14.1%44.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average5.2%22.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−109%–
EPS growth (TTM)−107%–
Profitability
Gross margin33.8%55.4% (better)
Operating margin2.1% (better)−27.2%
Net margin−0.62% (better)−95.1%
FCF margin5.3%6.5% (better)
Return on equity−1.2% (better)−72.0%
Return on invested capital2.3%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.07–
Net debt / EBITDA−1.06–
Interest coverage1.4× (better)−18.7×
Current ratio1.852.84 (better)
Altman Z-score–2.62
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions23.5%70.5%
Held by insiders12.0%9.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$32.6K (better)−$43.1M
Short interest, % of float1.1%11.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.