StockData

Ceragon Networks vs PicoCELA

CRNT and PCLA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CRNT and PCLA compare

Ceragon Networks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−14.1% versus −30.6% for PicoCELA).

Ceragon Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −0.62% compared with −115% at PicoCELA.

Ceragon Networks scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 1 for PicoCELA), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCRNTPCLA
Size and price
Share price$2.39$6.00
Change, 1 year5.8%−36.3%
Change, 5 years−15.2%–
Beta (5Y)1.042.92
Employees5055
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)1
Valuation score00
Growth score00
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score3 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−14.1% (better)−30.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average5.2%–
Net income growth (TTM)−109%–
EPS growth (TTM)−107%–
Profitability
Gross margin33.8%–
Operating margin2.1% (better)−110%
Net margin−0.62% (better)−115%
FCF margin5.3% (better)−105%
Return on equity−1.2% (better)−225%
Return on invested capital2.3% (better)−184%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.07 (better)0.69
Net debt / EBITDA−1.06–
Interest coverage1.4×–
Current ratio1.85 (better)1.76
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions23.5%0.01%
Held by insiders12.0%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$32.6K–
Short interest, % of float1.1%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.