StockData

Ceragon Networks vs Gilat Satellite Networks

CRNT and GILT side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How CRNT and GILT compare

Gilat Satellite Networks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (47.9% versus −14.1% for Ceragon Networks).

Gilat Satellite Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.6% compared with −0.62% at Ceragon Networks.

Gilat Satellite Networks scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for Ceragon Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricCRNTGILT
Size and price
Share price$2.39$5.59
Change, 1 year5.8%−58.2%
Change, 5 years−15.2%−22.1%
Beta (5Y)1.041.11
Employees501,159
StockData Score
Total score610 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score33
Health score35 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−14.1%47.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average5.2%22.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−109%−16.6% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−107%−22.7% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average–−11.6%
Profitability
Gross margin33.8% (better)29.5%
Operating margin2.1%5.2% (better)
Net margin−0.62%4.6% (better)
FCF margin5.3% (better)2.0%
Return on equity−1.2%4.8% (better)
Return on invested capital2.3%6.7% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.070.00 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA−1.06−3.34
Interest coverage1.4×–
Current ratio1.851.97 (better)
Piotroski F-score44
Ownership
Held by institutions23.5%39.5%
Held by insiders12.0%21.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$32.6K (better)−$1.3M
Short interest, % of float1.1%3.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.